MECHANISM PRESSURE
From prediction to mechanism
Ask not only what will happen, but why, what intervention changes it, and what this same unit would experience in another world.
Explore HCGM / DiscoSCM →A research system that grows—and lets evidence correct it
Our pursuit is not one model. It is a class of intelligent systems that learn mechanisms from heterogeneous units and data, test understanding through interventions and counterfactuals, and absorb real feedback through human-agent collaboration.
TabU is a wedge, not the whole map. Through unit-first tabular learning, it asks how shared laws hold across heterogeneous individuals.
01 · RESEARCH DIRECTION
How can intelligence move beyond correlation and understand generative mechanisms? How can it account for different units, contexts, and possible worlds? And how can that understanding enter action, then update under real feedback?
MECHANISM PRESSURE
Ask not only what will happen, but why, what intervention changes it, and what this same unit would experience in another world.
Explore HCGM / DiscoSCM →HETEROGENEITY PRESSURE
Treat Unit as a semantic primitive and study how shared response laws express individual differences through context, tokens, and abduction.
Explore TabU-lab →REALITY PRESSURE
Turn real human-agent work, evaluation, and correction into a feedback field, so research is not merely self-consistent on benchmarks.
Explore Agent Society →02 · RESEARCH MAP
These are not isolated departments. World models supply a language of mechanisms; unit-centered learning forces theory to face heterogeneity; human-agent systems return research to real collaboration and feedback.
CORE PROGRAM
Represent mechanisms, interventions, counterfactuals, and possible worlds—and make abduction learnable and auditable.
LEARNING WEDGE
Start from units, context, and shared response laws to explore new primitives for tabular foundation models, structured learning, and heterogeneous data.
FEEDBACK FIELD
Study personal avatars, agent societies, memory, and collaboration structures as a living field where research hypotheses meet reality.
Project names change and research questions grow. This is the current relationship map, not a closed taxonomy.
03 · OPEN WORK
UNIT / CONTEXT-SPECIFIC MECHANISMS
Treat unit-specific mechanisms as primary learning objects and revisit the relationship among counterfactuals, heterogeneity, and population-level models.
ROBUST PREDICTION WEDGE
A concrete robust-prediction wedge that tests ideas from mechanism learning and abduction.
TABULAR FOUNDATION MODELING
Open questions, gates, run receipts, and verdicts. There are currently no public training results, checkpoints, or benchmark claims.
UNDERSTANDING DATA-GENERATING PROCESSES
A Chinese-first book, question bank, cases, and feedback system that turns causal concepts into a knowledge spine that can be challenged and revised.
04 · HOW RESEARCH GROWS
A polished page cannot turn a proposal into a theory or a smoke run into a benchmark conclusion. We keep the boundaries between stages explicit.
Learn about MSP / Seed it till it grows →State what we actually want to know and what observation would change our judgment.
Choose the smallest topologically complete theoretical, modeling, experimental, or writing entry.
Record sources, assumptions, configurations, failures, run receipts, and claim boundaries.
Let people, agents, readers, and real systems apply pressure to the artifact.
Keep what survives, correct the question, and enter the next cycle.
RESEARCH NOTES
The Research Blog preserves developing arguments, architectures, reflections, and source trails. It is a living notebook, not a substitute for peer-reviewed papers.
Enter the Research Blog ↗WEHUB RESEARCH
Causal intelligence supplies long-term questions; human-agent systems supply real feedback. The loop between them is the research infrastructure WeHub is building.